 |
|
Donald Trump's announcement of a 26% 'discounted' reciprocal tariff on India has sparked debate and analysis regarding its potential impact on the Indian economy. While Trump presented this move as a measure to level the playing field and reclaim American economic dominance, experts suggest that the actual impact on India may be limited due to various factors, including India's diversified export strategy, relatively low reliance on external demand, and proactive measures to strengthen economic ties with the United States. However, certain sectors within the Indian economy are identified as more vulnerable to the tariffs, and the long-term implications of a global trade conflict remain a concern. Trump's announcement included proposed reciprocal tariffs on several countries, including China (34%), the European Union (20%), South Korea (25%), Japan (24%), and Taiwan (32%). This broad sweep suggests a wider strategy to reshape global trade relationships and address perceived imbalances. For India, the key question is how significantly these tariffs will affect its exports and overall economic growth. The article analyzes the potential consequences of these tariffs, explores the sectors most at risk, and examines India's preparedness to mitigate the negative effects and potentially capitalize on any emerging opportunities. Initial assessments suggest that the impact will be manageable, but a closer look reveals a more nuanced picture of vulnerabilities and strategic responses. The announcement of reciprocal tariffs comes after Trump made the claim that the United States has been 'looted' and 'plundered' by foreign nations. Trump made these remarks on what he called 'Liberation Day' – April 2, 2025 – stating that this day would be remembered as 'the day American industry was reborn.' The tariff announcements revealed that the United States determined India’s tariffs to the US to be at 52%, while the proposed discounted reciprocal tariff would be set at 26%. He also accused other countries of charging significantly higher rates on imported motorcycles and automobiles than the United States. Trump called out India specifically, saying that the Prime Minister is a 'great friend of mine, but you're not treating us right.'
Several reports and analyses suggest that the impact of Trump's tariffs on India is likely to be limited. A Citi Research report warned of possible annual losses up to $7 billion, while an SBI Research report projected a reduction of approximately 3 to 3.5 percent in Indian exports, assuming tariffs ranging between 15 and 20 percent. These projections indicate that the overall impact, while not insignificant, is not expected to be catastrophic. However, certain sectors are identified as facing higher vulnerability. Citi analysts pointed to chemicals, metal products, and jewelry as particularly exposed, while automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and food products remain substantially exposed as well. India's merchandise exports to the United States totalled around $74 billion in 2024, with pearls, gems, and jewelry accounting for $8.5 billion, pharmaceuticals contributing $8 billion, and petrochemicals amounting to approximately $4 billion. Morgan Stanley highlighted potential risks to India's pharmaceutical exports, which make up 2.8 percent of total exports and 0.3 percent of GDP, as these items have been identified as possible targets for tariffs. Additionally, GTRI's analysis indicated that fish, meat, and processed seafood exports, valued at $2.58 billion in 2024, would be most severely affected, facing a substantial 27.83 percent tariff difference. The introduction of US tariffs will notably reduce the competitiveness of shrimp exports to America. India's exports of processed food, sugar, and cocoa products, which reached $1.03 billion last year, are also likely to be impacted due to a significant tariff disparity of 24.99 percent. This breakdown of vulnerable sectors provides a clearer picture of where the Indian economy faces the greatest challenges from the tariffs.
Despite these vulnerabilities, India is taking proactive steps to mitigate the negative effects and potentially capitalize on new opportunities. The governments of India and the United States have established a timeline to finalize the initial phase of their agreement by September-October 2025. Both nations have also set an ambitious objective to escalate their two-way trade from the current $190 billion to $500 billion by 2030, which is a substantial increase of more than twofold. This demonstrates a commitment to strengthening economic ties despite the tariff-related challenges. India is also developing a comprehensive strategy to strengthen economic ties with the United States. India is evaluating several scenarios to understand the potential impact of reciprocal tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump on April 2, according to officials. The commerce and industry ministry has developed various models considering tariff differences and duties that Trump has implemented across different nations and industries to safeguard American manufacturing. Officials from the ministry have engaged with local manufacturers to understand the non-tariff obstacles their products encounter in the US market. A dedicated online platform for documenting such export barriers is scheduled to launch within the next two months. India is also prepared to negotiate a broad trade and investment agreement, offering reduced tariffs on specific products including pork, premium medical devices and luxury motorcycles, whilst providing production-linked incentives for shipping and support for logistics firms. To establish itself as a credible alternative to Chinese manufacturing, India is offering enhanced incentives, including tax benefits and simplified land access in states such as Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. These benefits target sectors like semiconductors, electronics, aircraft components and renewable energy. India aims to integrate into US supply chains by extending concessions to US firms that establish production facilities in India for fundamental and intermediate products, including basic semiconductors, solar panels, machinery and pharmaceutical items.
Furthermore, several factors suggest that India is relatively insulated from the broader impact of a global trade conflict. India's gross exports to the US are among the lowest among its Emerging Market peers. Fitch says India’s low reliance on external demand makes it ‘somewhat insulated’. Nomura's study on Asian contribution to US-bound global exports identifies Vietnam as having the highest risk exposure (8.9% of GDP), with other nations following: Taiwan (6.3%), Thailand (5.6%), Malaysia (4.6%), Singapore (4.5%) and South Korea (4.5%). Morgan Stanley says, “While India is exposed to direct tariff risks, we have consistently highlighted that the bigger effect on growth from tariffs likely comes via the indirect transmission channel of weaker corporate confidence from heightened policy uncertainty and the spillovers to capex and trade cycle. From this perspective, India's low goods trade orientation and ability to generate domestic demand offset mean it is among the least exposed economies within the region from an indirect effect standpoint.” However, it's important to acknowledge the potential for indirect effects. A Financial Times report citing Aston University's econometric research says that severe global retaliation against Trump's proposed 25% tariffs could result in a $1.4 trillion reduction in global income and significantly impact international trade. While India might experience increased export opportunities in areas where US buyers seek alternatives to suppliers affected by tariff barriers, this advantage is limited and temporary. India's reliance on imported energy, machinery, and sophisticated components poses risks. A widespread trade conflict would increase import costs, potentially leading to higher inflation and reduced government fiscal flexibility. The Reserve Bank of India, already concerned about food prices, might need to implement stricter monetary policies, potentially affecting economic growth. Therefore, while India may be relatively better positioned than some other economies, it is not immune to the negative consequences of a global trade disruption.
In conclusion, while Donald Trump's announcement of a 26% reciprocal tariff on India has generated concerns, the overall impact is expected to be limited due to India's diversified export strategy, relatively low reliance on external demand, and proactive measures to strengthen economic ties with the United States. Certain sectors, such as chemicals, metal products, jewelry, pharmaceuticals, and food products, are more vulnerable and require targeted support. India's strategic approach, including negotiations for a trade agreement, offering incentives to attract US companies, and exploring alternative markets, will play a crucial role in mitigating the negative effects and potentially capitalizing on emerging opportunities. Despite these advantages, India remains vulnerable to the broader negative consequences of a global trade disruption, including increased import costs, higher inflation, and reduced government fiscal flexibility. Therefore, a balanced approach that combines proactive domestic policies with efforts to promote a stable and predictable global trade environment is essential for ensuring India's long-term economic growth and prosperity.