 |
|
The film 'Jaat,' starring Sunny Deol, is presented as a vehicle for Deol's signature brand of action, filled with excessive violence and a simplistic narrative. The reviewer critiques the movie's over-the-top action sequences, the lack of a coherent plot, and the desensitizing effect of the constant bloodshed. The core argument centers around the film's reliance on Deol's established persona as an action hero, specifically referencing his iconic 'dhai kilo ka haath,' and how this reliance overshadows any attempt at meaningful storytelling or character development. The reviewer points out that the film is essentially a series of violent set-pieces strung together with weak justifications for the action. The plot involves Brigadier Baldev Pratap Singh, portrayed by Sunny Deol, battling against enemies in Andhra Pradesh. Randeep Hooda plays the antagonist, Rana Thunga, known for his brutality. The reviewer expresses dismay at the film's focus on violence, describing scenes of decapitation and the mistreatment of women as distasteful and reminiscent of outdated Bollywood tropes. The reviewer also criticizes the illogical elements of the plot, such as the explanation for the conflict in Andhra Pradesh, which involves a nonsensical connection to atom bomb research. The ultimate verdict is that 'Jaat' fails to deliver a compelling cinematic experience, leaving the audience numb and desensitized due to the unrelenting violence and the absence of a meaningful narrative. The movie's only purpose seems to be showing Sunny Deol's action skills, ignoring story depth. The reviewer ultimately gives the film a rating of 1.5 stars, indicating a significant lack of overall quality. The criticism focuses on the shallowness of the plot, the gratuitous nature of the violence, and the overall lack of artistic merit. The film, according to the review, is a disappointment, failing to offer anything beyond mindless action and relying solely on the established star power of Sunny Deol. The reviewer notes that the film attempts to evoke patriotic sentiments through dialogue about 'dharti,' 'mitti,' and 'watan,' but these attempts feel hollow and unconvincing in the context of the film's overall violence. The reviewer finds that the film's attempt to capture the charm of old masala Bollywood flicks fails because it is excessively violent and lacking of the story richness of older films. The reviewer does acknowledge Randeep Hooda's portrayal of the villain, but notes that his character is ultimately overshadowed by the film's excessive violence and weak plot. The movie sacrifices plot development in favor of gore and action. The reviewer implies that the movie's main goal is to show Deol doing what audiences expect him to do. This results in a lack of depth and originality. The reviewer believes the film is a throwback to the worst of Bollywood's action films, and it fails to live up to any kind of standard.
The problems with Jaat begin with the threadbare plot. The justification for the extensive violence and the conflict in Andhra Pradesh is weak and unconvincing. The idea that the soil of the coastline is rich in elements that go into making an atom bomb, hatched in Davos, Switzerland, is described as 'rigmarole' and 'window-dressing.' This suggests that the filmmakers themselves are aware of the plot's absurdity but choose to ignore it in favor of more action sequences. Furthermore, the reviewer highlights the film's reliance on outdated tropes, such as the portrayal of women and the depiction of violence. The scenes involving the ripping-off-the-clothes and the lustful men setting upon the women are deemed 'ugly' and reminiscent of the 'high on melodrama-and-glycerine masala mish-mashes Bollywood used to churn out in the 70s and 80s.' This comparison underscores the film's failure to innovate or offer a fresh perspective on the action genre. The reviewer is also clearly frustrated with the film's pacing and length. The 'nearly 160-minute duration' is described as 'ultra-long,' suggesting that the film overstays its welcome. The constant stream of violence becomes monotonous and desensitizing, ultimately diminishing its impact. The reviewer questions the point of stacking up so many bodies and chopping off so many heads, implying that the film's violence is gratuitous and serves no meaningful purpose. The reviewer argues that the film's reliance on violence comes at the expense of coherence and plot. The story is sacrificed in the service of showcasing Sunny Deol's action prowess. This results in a film that is visually chaotic and emotionally empty. The characters are underdeveloped, and their motivations are unclear. The only thing that matters is the constant stream of violence. The film lacks depth, originality, and sophistication. The film is presented as a generic action film with nothing new to offer to the genre. The reviewer is not impressed. The film does not explore themes, it just tries to offer a simple action story, and it fails to do even that.
The review of 'Jaat' underscores the importance of a well-crafted narrative and meaningful character development, even in the action genre. The reviewer's disappointment stems from the film's failure to deliver anything beyond mindless violence and reliance on established tropes. The critique is also a commentary on the state of Bollywood action films, suggesting that the genre needs to evolve beyond simplistic narratives and gratuitous violence. The reviewer's use of vivid language and strong opinions creates a compelling and persuasive argument against the film. The references to 'dhai kilo ka haath,' 'gaddars,' and 'Sar Katey Ka Aatank part 2' paint a clear picture of the film's over-the-top nature. The reviewer's condemnation of the film's depiction of women and violence adds a moral dimension to the critique. The film is not only criticized for being poorly made but also for being offensive and harmful. The reviewer implicitly suggests that films have a responsibility to be more than just entertainment. They should also be thoughtful, responsible, and contribute something positive to society. 'Jaat' fails to meet these standards, and the reviewer's criticism reflects this failure. The reviewer's harsh words serve as a warning to both filmmakers and audiences. Filmmakers should be wary of relying on tired tropes and gratuitous violence, and audiences should demand more from their entertainment. The film industry needs to move forward. 'Jaat' is a step backwards. The reviewer calls for film makers to take more responsibility in creating complex characters and interesting stories and not just relying on the fame and physique of known action stars. The reviewer sees the film as an example of how lazy or poorly-conceived films can be and that audiences should demand a more intellectual investment in their entertainment. The future of the action film needs to be re-imagined and re-engineered to fit the modern intellectual demand of its audiences.
Source: Jaat movie review: Sunny Deol-starrer leaves you numb, unmoving, and desensitised