 |
|
The murder of Om Prakash, a former Director General of Police (DGP) of Karnataka, allegedly at the hands of his wife, Pallavi Omprakash, has sent shockwaves throughout the state. The gruesome details emerging from the investigation paint a picture of a deeply troubled family dynamic, marred by allegations of domestic violence, mental illness, and a protracted property dispute. Pallavi Omprakash was arrested following a complaint filed by her son, Kartikesh, who expressed strong suspicion about his mother and sister, Kriti, being involved in the killing. The case has been transferred to the Central Crime Branch of Bengaluru (CCB) to ensure a thorough and impartial investigation, given the high profile of the victim and the sensitivity of the circumstances surrounding his death. The initial police investigation indicates that the murder took place in Prakash's HSR Layout residence on a Sunday afternoon. According to preliminary reports, Pallavi allegedly attacked her husband with chilli powder and a kitchen knife while he was having lunch. The attack was reportedly brutal, with Pallavi stabbing Prakash multiple times in the neck, shoulder, abdomen, and back. Police sources suggest that she also hit him with a bottle of oil and that he struggled for approximately fifteen minutes before succumbing to his injuries. The presence of toilet cleaner and floor cleaner bottles near his body suggests a possible attempt to conceal evidence or further harm the victim. The scene described by law enforcement officials is disturbing. Prakash was found lying face down, his head wrapped in a blanket, and his clothes soaked in blood. The severity of the attack points to a deep-seated rage and a clear intent to inflict fatal harm. The investigation is currently focusing on establishing whether Kriti, the couple's daughter, was present on the same floor during the commission of the crime. While initial reports suggest that she was in her room on the third floor, her potential involvement in the events leading up to the murder is being carefully scrutinized. Pallavi's behavior following the alleged murder has added another layer of complexity to the case. After allegedly killing her husband, she reportedly made a video call to a friend, a retired officer's wife, confessing to the crime and stating that she had 'killed the monster.' This statement, if proven to be accurate, could provide crucial insight into Pallavi's state of mind and her perceived justification for her actions. She also contacted other individuals, informing them of the incident, which ultimately led to the authorities being alerted. Interestingly, Pallavi herself called the HSR Layout police to report the murder before the police helpline could respond to the initial alerts. This proactive action raises questions about her intentions and whether she was attempting to control the narrative surrounding the event. The complaint filed by Kartikesh, Prakash's son, provides a crucial perspective on the family's troubled history. He alleges that his mother had been threatening to kill his father for the past week, prompting Prakash to temporarily move to his sister's house for safety. Kartikesh further alleges that his sister, Kriti, pressured their father to return home against his will, just days before the murder. This claim suggests that Kriti may have been aware of her mother's intentions or played a role in manipulating the situation to facilitate the crime. Kartikesh's statement underscores the strained relationship between his parents and the potential for a volatile environment within the household. He explicitly names his mother and sister as suspects in his father's murder, requesting legal action against them. The investigation is also exploring the possibility of a property dispute as a contributing factor to the crime. Sources indicate that a disagreement over a piece of property in Dandeli, Karnataka, was a major point of contention between the couple. Prakash owned several properties in the Uttara Kannada district, and Pallavi reportedly believed that she and her daughter were being unfairly excluded from inheriting these assets. This financial tension could have exacerbated existing tensions within the family and contributed to the escalation of the conflict. A particularly disturbing aspect of the case is the revelation that Pallavi had sent a desperate message to an IPS officers' WhatsApp group, alleging severe domestic violence at the hands of her husband. In this message, she described herself and her daughter as being in a 'precarious, dangerous, unsafe situation' and pleaded for urgent help and security. She claimed that Prakash was lacing her food with insulin and sanitiser and drugging her daughter to target her brain. These allegations paint a picture of a deeply paranoid and distressed individual, fearing for her own safety and the well-being of her daughter. She also accused Prakash of manipulating people by declaring them mentally unstable to cover up his acts and attributed his behavior to 'greed' and 'lust for money.' This message, if authentic, provides compelling evidence of Pallavi's mental state in the days and weeks leading up to the murder and suggests a possible motive rooted in her perception of Prakash as a threat to her life and the lives of her loved ones. The police faced resistance from Kriti when they attempted to investigate the crime scene. She reportedly refused to open her third-floor house door and created a ruckus when police forced their way in. She also resisted providing her fingerprints, only relenting after significant persuasion. This behavior could be interpreted as an attempt to obstruct the investigation or conceal evidence. The revelation that Pallavi had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and was taking medication adds another layer of complexity to the case. Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that can cause hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking, which can significantly impair a person's ability to function normally. The impact of her mental illness on her actions and her culpability in the crime will undoubtedly be a central focus of the investigation and any subsequent legal proceedings. Om Prakash was cremated with full state honors in Bengaluru, and his son, Kartikesh, performed the last rites. Following the cremation, Kartikesh expressed his faith in the police investigation and declined to comment further, stating that he would wait for the investigation to reveal the truth. Prakash was a highly respected police officer who served as DGP of Karnataka. The circumstances surrounding his death are tragic and have brought shame to law enforcement, given his standing in the community. The case raises questions about the complex interplay of domestic violence, mental illness, and financial disputes, and the devastating consequences that can result when these factors converge. The investigation is ongoing, and the truth about what happened in the Prakash residence will continue to unfold in the coming days and weeks.