) |
|
S. Jaishankar, India's longest-serving foreign minister since Jawaharlal Nehru, has articulated a compelling vision for a reformed world order, challenging the existing 'liberal rules-based order' as biased and in need of a fundamental shake-up. His recent interview with the Financial Times provides a comprehensive overview of his perspectives on various geopolitical dynamics, including the potential return of Donald Trump, India's relationships with the United States, Russia, and China, and his transition from a career diplomat to a political figure within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Jaishankar's arguments center on the premise that the current global system, largely shaped in the aftermath of World War II, disproportionately favors the West and fails to adequately reflect the contemporary realities of a multipolar world. He emphasizes the need for a more equitable and representative international order that acknowledges the rise of emerging powers like India and addresses the shortcomings of the existing framework. This perspective is not merely a call for incremental adjustments but a demand for a systemic overhaul that fundamentally alters the distribution of power and influence on the global stage. The existing order, according to Jaishankar, fosters 'unrestrained competition' and risks plunging the world into 'very anarchic' conditions if left unaddressed. His critique extends beyond the structural inequalities of the system, encompassing the perceived hypocrisy and selective application of its principles. He suggests that the virtues of the old world order are often exaggerated, and that a more realistic and pragmatic approach is required to navigate the complexities of the 21st century. This involves recognizing the diverse perspectives and interests of different nations and fostering a more inclusive and collaborative approach to global governance. The rise of Donald Trump and the potential for his return to the presidency loom large in Jaishankar's analysis. Trump's 'America First' policies and his transactional approach to international relations have sent shockwaves across American allies, raising questions about the reliability of the United States as a global leader and the future of the transatlantic alliance. While acknowledging Trump's disruptive tendencies, Jaishankar also characterizes him as a 'realist,' suggesting that his actions are driven by a pragmatic assessment of American interests. This nuanced perspective reflects India's own pragmatic approach to foreign policy, which prioritizes national interests and strategic autonomy. Despite Trump's past criticisms of India as the 'world's largest tariff abuser,' Jaishankar remains optimistic about the prospects for deepening strategic ties between the two nations. He anticipates that India and the United States will soon strike a trade deal, signaling a continued commitment to strengthening their economic relationship. However, he also recognizes the need for India to develop its own strategy to navigate the uncertainties surrounding Trump's policies, particularly in relation to China. India's relationship with Russia is another key focus of Jaishankar's analysis. Despite pressure from the West to scale back ties with Moscow in response to the conflict in Ukraine, India has steadfastly maintained its long-standing relationship with Russia. Jaishankar defends this position by asserting that India has its own perspective and cannot simply abandon its historical ties with Russia. He argues that India's relationship with Russia is based on mutual interests and strategic considerations, including energy security and defense cooperation. India's continued purchase of oil from Russia, despite Western sanctions, underscores its commitment to prioritizing its own economic needs and maintaining its strategic autonomy. This stance has drawn criticism from some Western countries, but Jaishankar remains resolute in his defense of India's sovereign right to pursue its own foreign policy objectives. The complex and evolving relationship between India and China is also addressed by Jaishankar. He acknowledges that relations with Beijing 'haven't gone so well' due to ongoing border clashes between the two nations' armies. This statement reflects the significant challenges facing the India-China relationship, which has been strained by territorial disputes and strategic competition. Jaishankar emphasizes that 'you can't have bad border and good relations at the same time,' highlighting the importance of resolving the border issue for the overall improvement of bilateral ties. Despite the challenges, India remains committed to engaging with China through diplomatic channels and seeking peaceful solutions to the border dispute. However, it is also clear that India is prepared to defend its territorial integrity and protect its strategic interests. The growing ties between China and Russia are also a matter of concern for India, but Jaishankar maintains that ties between New Delhi and Moscow remain 'steady.' This suggests that India is confident in its ability to manage its relationships with both China and Russia, despite the complex geopolitical dynamics in the region. Finally, Jaishankar addresses his own transition from a career diplomat to a political figure within the BJP. He states that joining Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party was 'not an issue at all' for him, and that he is 'very comfortable' with the policies of the BJP government. This reflects Jaishankar's alignment with the BJP's nationalist ideology and its vision for a strong and assertive India on the global stage. His decision to enter politics underscores the growing importance of foreign policy in Indian politics and the increasing role of diplomats in shaping the country's international relations. In conclusion, S. Jaishankar's interview provides a valuable insight into India's foreign policy perspectives and its vision for a reformed world order. His emphasis on realism, strategic autonomy, and the need for a more equitable and representative international system reflects India's growing confidence and its aspirations to play a leading role in shaping the future of global governance. The issues raised by Jaishankar are crucial for understanding the dynamics of the 21st century and the challenges facing the international community.
The core of Jaishankar's argument lies in the perceived obsolescence of the existing 'liberal rules-based order.' He contends that this order, established in the aftermath of World War II, primarily serves the interests of Western powers and fails to adequately accommodate the rise of emerging economies and the evolving geopolitical landscape. This critique is not simply a matter of seeking a greater share of power within the existing system; it represents a fundamental challenge to the underlying principles and norms that govern international relations. The existing order, according to Jaishankar, is characterized by a bias towards Western values and priorities, and it often fails to take into account the diverse perspectives and interests of other nations. This bias is evident in a variety of areas, including trade, finance, and security. For example, the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) are often criticized for favoring developed countries and disadvantaging developing countries. Similarly, the international financial system is dominated by Western institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, which often impose conditionalities on developing countries that are not in their best interests. In the realm of security, the United States and its allies often act unilaterally, without seeking the approval of the United Nations Security Council, which undermines the principle of multilateralism. Jaishankar's call for a 'shake-up' of the liberal rules-based order is therefore a call for a more inclusive and equitable system that takes into account the interests of all nations. This would involve reforming international institutions, such as the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank, to make them more representative and accountable. It would also involve strengthening the role of the United Nations Security Council and promoting multilateralism in addressing global challenges. The potential return of Donald Trump to the presidency adds another layer of complexity to the global geopolitical landscape. Trump's 'America First' policies and his skepticism towards multilateral institutions have already undermined the existing world order, and his return could further accelerate this trend. Jaishankar's characterization of Trump as a 'realist' suggests that he believes Trump is primarily driven by a pragmatic assessment of American interests, rather than by a commitment to upholding the existing international order. This implies that India needs to be prepared for a more transactional and unpredictable relationship with the United States under a Trump administration. India's relationship with Russia is another key factor shaping its foreign policy. Despite pressure from the West to isolate Russia in response to the conflict in Ukraine, India has maintained its long-standing ties with Moscow. This is partly due to India's dependence on Russia for military hardware and energy supplies, but it is also rooted in a deeper strategic calculation. India views Russia as a counterweight to China and as a potential partner in promoting a multipolar world order. Jaishankar's defense of India's relationship with Russia reflects this strategic calculus. He argues that India has its own perspective on the conflict in Ukraine and that it cannot simply abandon its historical ties with Russia. The complex and evolving relationship between India and China is another major challenge facing Indian foreign policy. The two countries have a long history of border disputes and strategic competition, and relations have been strained in recent years by clashes along their shared border. Jaishankar's acknowledgement that relations with Beijing 'haven't gone so well' reflects the seriousness of the challenges facing the India-China relationship. However, he also emphasizes the importance of resolving the border issue and improving overall bilateral ties. India's ability to manage its relationship with China will be crucial for its future security and prosperity. Finally, Jaishankar's transition from a career diplomat to a political figure within the BJP underscores the growing importance of foreign policy in Indian politics. His decision to join the BJP reflects his alignment with the party's nationalist ideology and its vision for a strong and assertive India on the global stage.
In dissecting Jaishankar's perspective, it's vital to acknowledge the inherent tensions and complexities within India's foreign policy approach. While advocating for a reformed world order, India simultaneously navigates the existing system to advance its own national interests. This necessitates a delicate balancing act, requiring India to engage constructively with both established powers and emerging actors. The call for a more equitable and representative international order resonates with many developing countries that feel marginalized by the current system. However, translating this vision into concrete action requires building coalitions and forging consensus on specific reform proposals. India's ability to effectively advocate for its vision will depend on its diplomatic skills and its ability to build trust and confidence among other nations. The potential return of Donald Trump presents both challenges and opportunities for India. While Trump's unpredictable foreign policy could create instability and uncertainty, it could also provide India with greater strategic autonomy. If the United States under Trump were to disengage from certain regions or multilateral institutions, India could step in to fill the void and play a more prominent role on the global stage. However, this would require India to be prepared to shoulder greater responsibilities and to take on a more assertive leadership role. India's relationship with Russia is a source of ongoing debate and scrutiny. While India's dependence on Russian military hardware and energy supplies provides a strong incentive to maintain close ties, its strategic partnership with the United States creates a conflicting imperative. Navigating this complex dynamic requires India to strike a delicate balance between its competing interests and to avoid alienating either Russia or the United States. The India-China relationship remains the most significant challenge facing Indian foreign policy. The border dispute and strategic competition between the two countries have created a deep sense of distrust and rivalry. While both countries have expressed a desire to improve relations, progress has been slow and halting. Resolving the border dispute and building trust will require sustained dialogue and a willingness to compromise on both sides. Jaishankar's emphasis on the need for a 'shake-up' of the liberal rules-based order raises important questions about the future of global governance. The existing system is facing increasing challenges from both within and without. The rise of populism and nationalism in many countries has undermined support for multilateralism and international cooperation. At the same time, the growing power of emerging economies has created new demands for a more equitable distribution of power and influence. Whether the existing system can adapt to these challenges remains to be seen. However, it is clear that a more inclusive and representative international order is essential for addressing the global challenges of the 21st century. Jaishankar's articulation of India's foreign policy perspectives provides a valuable contribution to this debate. His emphasis on realism, strategic autonomy, and the need for a more equitable international system reflects India's growing confidence and its aspirations to play a leading role in shaping the future of global governance. As India continues to rise as a global power, its foreign policy choices will have a significant impact on the world stage. Understanding India's perspectives and priorities is therefore essential for navigating the complexities of the 21st century and for building a more peaceful and prosperous future for all.
Furthermore, the nuance in Jaishankar's statements demands closer scrutiny. His description of Trump as a 'realist' isn't necessarily an endorsement of Trump's policies, but rather an acknowledgment of the underlying principles driving them – a focus on national interest, often prioritized over multilateral commitments. This recognition allows India to strategize and prepare for various scenarios under a potential Trump presidency. It underscores the pragmatic approach India often adopts, adapting to changing global dynamics while safeguarding its strategic autonomy. This adaptability is crucial as the global landscape is increasingly characterized by volatility and unpredictability. India's relationship with Russia presents a particularly complex dilemma. Western pressure to condemn and isolate Russia places significant strain on India, given its historical ties and ongoing strategic partnership. India's refusal to unequivocally denounce Russia stems from multiple factors. Firstly, Russia remains a vital supplier of defense equipment to India, a legacy of decades-long cooperation. Secondly, India views Russia as a counterweight to China, a rising power with whom it shares a complex and often fraught relationship. Abandoning Russia would not only jeopardize its defense capabilities but also potentially embolden China. Therefore, India's approach is carefully calibrated, balancing its strategic interests with the expectations of its Western partners. This balancing act highlights the challenges faced by emerging powers as they navigate a multipolar world. The complex dynamics of the India-China relationship require careful consideration. The border dispute remains a significant obstacle to improving bilateral ties. While both countries recognize the importance of economic cooperation, the ongoing territorial disagreements cast a long shadow over the relationship. Jaishankar's statement that 'you can't have bad border and good relations at the same time' underscores the fundamental need to resolve the border issue for any meaningful progress in other areas. In addition to the border dispute, strategic competition between India and China is intensifying. Both countries are vying for influence in the Indo-Pacific region, and their geopolitical interests often clash. Despite these challenges, India recognizes the importance of engaging with China through diplomatic channels and seeking peaceful solutions to outstanding issues. A stable and cooperative relationship with China is essential for regional stability and for India's own economic development. The assertion that the 'liberal rules-based order' is biased requires a deep understanding of historical context. The system established after World War II was largely shaped by Western powers, reflecting their values and priorities. While this system has contributed to global peace and prosperity, it has also been criticized for its inherent inequalities and its failure to adequately address the needs of developing countries. The rise of emerging economies like India has challenged the dominance of the West and created new demands for a more equitable distribution of power and influence. Jaishankar's call for a 'shake-up' of the liberal rules-based order is not a rejection of the principles of multilateralism or international cooperation, but rather a demand for a more inclusive and representative system that takes into account the interests of all nations. His transition from a diplomat to a political figure underscores the increasing importance of foreign policy in Indian politics. As India's global influence grows, its foreign policy choices will have a profound impact on the world stage. Jaishankar's articulation of India's foreign policy perspectives provides valuable insight into the country's strategic thinking and its vision for a multipolar world. His emphasis on realism, strategic autonomy, and the need for a more equitable international system reflects India's growing confidence and its determination to play a leading role in shaping the future of global governance. The ongoing geopolitical shifts demand a critical examination of the existing world order and a willingness to adapt to changing realities. India's foreign policy choices will be crucial in navigating these turbulent times and in promoting a more peaceful and prosperous future for all.