 |
|
The recent controversy surrounding a fashion show held in Gulmarg, Kashmir, has ignited a fierce debate about the region's cultural identity, its relationship with modernity, and the influence of religious conservatism. The author argues that the outrage over the event, particularly during the holy month of Ramadan, is symptomatic of a deeper resistance to change and a clinging to outdated ideologies that have historically hindered Kashmir's progress. This resistance, the author contends, stands in stark contrast to the modernization efforts underway in Saudi Arabia, a country traditionally associated with religious conservatism. The article posits that Kashmir's future prosperity hinges on its ability to embrace modernity and shed the 'cloistered and violent baggage of Islamism' that has plagued it for decades. The author uses the Gulmarg fashion show as a microcosm of this larger struggle, highlighting the tension between those who seek to modernize Kashmir and those who wish to preserve its traditional values, even if it means stifling economic and social development. The article critiques the reactions of various political and religious leaders, including Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and Omar Abdullah, accusing them of pandering to conservative elements and reinforcing Kashmir's exceptionalism. The author champions a more open and progressive Kashmir, one that welcomes innovation and embraces the opportunities presented by the fashion industry. The central argument revolves around the idea that Kashmir's potential for growth and prosperity is intrinsically linked to its ability to overcome religious conservatism and embrace modernity. The author draws a parallel between Kashmir and Saudi Arabia, highlighting the latter's transformation under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as a model for Kashmir to emulate. The piece further emphasizes that the historical roots of Kashmirian culture reveals that intricate weaving and craftsmanship were present in the region between 3000 BC and 1000 BC, thus, the author indicates that embracing the fashion industry is not an act of neglecting the culture in Kashmir, but rather celebrating it. The author implicitly suggests that economic progress, social harmony, and a more peaceful future for Kashmir depend on its willingness to embrace change and reject the forces of conservatism that seek to hold it back. The piece advocates for a proactive approach to attracting investment and fostering a thriving fashion industry in the Valley, arguing that such initiatives would not only boost the economy but also contribute to a more open and tolerant society. The author concludes by reiterating the importance of embracing modernity as a prerequisite for a prosperous and peaceful Kashmir, warning that infrastructure projects alone will not suffice if the region remains trapped in the past.
The core of the argument lies in the perceived hypocrisy of opposing a fashion show in Kashmir while Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, is actively promoting its own fashion industry. The author questions the motives of those who criticize the Gulmarg event, suggesting that their objections are rooted in a desire to maintain control and perpetuate a conservative agenda. The article directly challenges the notion that the fashion show was inherently offensive or harmful, questioning whether it violated any Indian laws or showcased nudity. The author suggests that the criticism is more about asserting dominance and reinforcing traditional norms than about genuine concern for religious sensitivities. The article implicitly argues that such resistance to change is detrimental to Kashmir's long-term interests, hindering its ability to compete in a globalized world and attract investment. The author employs a rhetorical strategy of contrasting Kashmir's conservatism with Saudi Arabia's modernization, creating a sense of urgency and highlighting the potential consequences of remaining stagnant. The piece further highlights that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) suggests that Neolithic Kashmiris were adept at weaving and intricate craftsmanship, indicating that the fashion industry is not in fact a foreign practice to Kashmir. The author implies that the fashion show is more representative of the region's natural artistic capabilities than the protestors give credit for. The author also suggests that the outrage is politically motivated, with various leaders using the controversy to score points and advance their own agendas. The BJP's Sunil Sharma's accusation against Chief Minister Omar Abdullah exemplifies this political maneuvering, suggesting that the event was orchestrated to undermine the government. The author criticizes this kind of political opportunism, arguing that it distracts from the real issues facing Kashmir and perpetuates a cycle of conflict and division. By framing the issue as a battle between modernity and conservatism, the author seeks to mobilize support for a more progressive vision of Kashmir's future. The piece aims to persuade readers that embracing change and rejecting religious extremism are essential for unlocking Kashmir's full potential.
The author's perspective is firmly rooted in the belief that modernity and progress are inherently intertwined, and that religious conservatism is a major obstacle to development. The argument is presented with a strong sense of conviction, reflecting the author's personal views and experiences. The article utilizes a persuasive tone, employing rhetorical questions and direct appeals to logic and reason. The author's reliance on anecdotal evidence, such as the examples of Saudi Arabia's fashion industry and the archaeological findings at Burzahom, may be seen as both a strength and a weakness. While these examples provide compelling illustrations of the author's points, they may not be representative of the broader complexities of the issue. The author's decision to frame the controversy in terms of a clash between modernity and Islamism may also be seen as overly simplistic, potentially overlooking the diverse perspectives and nuanced arguments within Kashmiri society. The article does not explore the potential negative consequences of unchecked modernization or the legitimate concerns of those who seek to preserve traditional values. A more balanced and nuanced approach would have acknowledged the validity of these concerns and explored potential solutions that respect both tradition and progress. Despite these limitations, the article raises important questions about Kashmir's future and the role of culture, religion, and politics in shaping its trajectory. The author's passionate advocacy for a more open and progressive Kashmir is a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate about the region's identity and its place in the world. The article serves as a call to action, urging Kashmiris to embrace change and reject the forces of conservatism that seek to hold them back from achieving their full potential. The article ultimately champions a vision of Kashmir as a thriving, modern society that is both economically prosperous and culturally vibrant.
Source: Kashmir Regresses Over Gulmarg Fashion Show As Saudi Embraces Modernity - News18