![]() |
|
The recent controversy surrounding the Shivan & Narresh fashion show in Gulmarg, Jammu and Kashmir, during the holy month of Ramadan, highlights the delicate balance between artistic expression, cultural sensitivity, and religious observance. The designers' apology, while acknowledging the hurt caused, underscores the complexities of navigating diverse cultural landscapes in the pursuit of creative endeavors. This incident raises pertinent questions about the responsibility of artists and brands to be mindful of the potential impact of their actions on different communities, particularly in regions with distinct cultural and religious identities. The fallout from the fashion show, extending from social media outrage to discussions in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, demonstrates the significant repercussions that can arise when cultural sensitivities are perceived to be disregarded. The controversy also serves as a reminder of the power of social media to amplify voices and shape public opinion, further complicating the already intricate dynamics of cultural exchange and artistic expression. Furthermore, the involvement of political figures, such as Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, underscores the political dimensions of cultural events, particularly in regions with a history of social and political tensions. The incident also throws light on the role of tourism in such sensitive regions and the need to strike a balance between promoting tourism and respecting local customs and traditions. The designers' initial intention, as stated in their apology, was to celebrate creativity and the 'ski & après-ski lifestyle.' However, the context in which the fashion show was held – during Ramadan and in a region with a strong Sufi tradition and religious outlook – significantly altered its reception. This discrepancy between intention and perception is a crucial aspect of the controversy and emphasizes the importance of considering the specific cultural and social context when planning and executing artistic or commercial activities. The reaction from prominent religious figures, such as Kashmir’s chief cleric Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, further amplified the outrage and emphasized the perceived affront to religious sentiments. Farooq’s description of the fashion show as “outrageous” and “obscene” reflects the deeply held values and beliefs of a significant segment of the population. The incident also raises questions about the appropriateness of using religious or cultural traditions as backdrops for commercial events, particularly when those events are perceived to be at odds with the values and practices associated with those traditions. The reactions from other political figures, such as People’s Conference president Sajad Lone and Srinagar MP Aga Ruhullah Mehdi, further underscore the widespread condemnation of the fashion show. Their objections highlight the political dimensions of the controversy and the potential for cultural events to become entangled in broader political debates. The fact that the fashion show was held to mark the 15th anniversary of a luxury brand further complicates the issue. The event can be viewed as an attempt to leverage the exotic and picturesque setting of Gulmarg to promote the brand and its products. However, this attempt backfired when the fashion show was perceived as disrespectful to local customs and traditions. The controversy serves as a cautionary tale for brands and businesses seeking to operate in culturally sensitive regions. It emphasizes the importance of conducting thorough research and engaging with local communities to ensure that their activities are aligned with local values and beliefs. The incident also underscores the need for brands to be prepared to respond quickly and effectively to any concerns or criticisms that may arise. The apology issued by Shivan & Narresh is a step in the right direction, but it remains to be seen whether it will be sufficient to fully address the concerns of the community. The controversy is a microcosm of the challenges and complexities that arise when globalization and cultural exchange intersect with local traditions and values. It is a reminder that businesses and artists must be mindful of the potential impact of their actions on different communities and be prepared to adapt their approaches accordingly. The long-term impact of the controversy on the Shivan & Narresh brand remains to be seen. However, the incident has undoubtedly damaged the brand’s reputation and raised questions about its commitment to cultural sensitivity. The brand will need to take concrete steps to rebuild trust with the community and demonstrate its commitment to respecting local customs and traditions. In conclusion, the Shivan & Narresh fashion show controversy in Gulmarg is a complex and multifaceted issue that highlights the delicate balance between artistic expression, cultural sensitivity, and religious observance. It serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and respecting local values and beliefs, particularly in culturally sensitive regions. The incident also underscores the power of social media to amplify voices and shape public opinion, further complicating the already intricate dynamics of cultural exchange and artistic expression. The controversy has significant implications for brands and businesses seeking to operate in culturally sensitive regions and emphasizes the need for thorough research, community engagement, and a willingness to adapt to local customs and traditions.
The uproar surrounding the fashion show also reflects a broader tension between modernity and tradition, particularly in regions undergoing rapid social and economic change. The desire to promote tourism and economic development can sometimes clash with the preservation of cultural heritage and religious values. This tension is particularly acute in Kashmir, a region with a rich cultural history and a strong religious identity. The fashion show, with its perceived disregard for local customs and traditions, can be seen as a symbol of this broader tension. The controversy also raises questions about the role of government in regulating cultural events and ensuring that they are aligned with local values and beliefs. While Chief Minister Omar Abdullah stated that his government had no role to play in the event, he also acknowledged that the organizers did not use their minds or pay heed to public sentiments. This suggests that the government has a responsibility to provide guidance and oversight to ensure that cultural events are conducted in a respectful and sensitive manner. The incident also highlights the importance of fostering dialogue and understanding between different communities and cultures. In a globalized world, it is increasingly important for people to be able to interact with and appreciate different cultures without causing offense or disrespect. This requires a willingness to learn about and understand different perspectives and to be sensitive to the potential impact of one's actions on others. The controversy surrounding the fashion show is a reminder that cultural sensitivity is not simply a matter of avoiding explicit acts of disrespect. It also requires a deeper understanding of the values, beliefs, and customs that are important to different communities. It requires a willingness to engage with local communities and to listen to their concerns. It requires a commitment to adapting one's approach to ensure that it is aligned with local values and beliefs. The designers' apology, while a necessary step, is not sufficient to fully address the concerns of the community. The designers need to demonstrate a genuine understanding of the hurt that they have caused and a commitment to learning from their mistakes. They need to engage with local communities and to work to rebuild trust. They need to demonstrate that they are committed to respecting local customs and traditions in their future activities. The controversy also provides an opportunity for the fashion industry as a whole to reflect on its practices and to consider how it can be more culturally sensitive. The fashion industry has a powerful influence on culture and society, and it has a responsibility to use that influence in a positive way. It can do this by promoting diversity and inclusion, by supporting ethical and sustainable practices, and by being mindful of the potential impact of its activities on different communities. In conclusion, the Shivan & Narresh fashion show controversy in Gulmarg is a complex and multifaceted issue that has important implications for artists, businesses, governments, and communities. It is a reminder of the importance of cultural sensitivity, dialogue, and understanding in a globalized world. It is an opportunity to learn from mistakes and to build a more respectful and inclusive society.
The situation underscores the challenge of balancing tradition and modernity in a rapidly changing world. Kashmir, with its rich cultural heritage and deep-rooted religious traditions, represents a microcosm of this global dilemma. The desire to promote tourism and economic development often clashes with the need to preserve and respect local customs and values. This tension requires careful negotiation and a nuanced approach that considers the sensitivities of the local population. The fashion show, while intended as a celebration of creativity, inadvertently became a symbol of this conflict, highlighting the potential for cultural misunderstandings and the importance of cross-cultural communication. The controversy also brings to the forefront the role of media and social media in shaping public perception and amplifying cultural sensitivities. The rapid spread of images and videos from the fashion show through social media platforms fueled the outrage and contributed to the widespread condemnation of the event. This underscores the power of social media to mobilize public opinion and hold individuals and organizations accountable for their actions. The designers' apology, while a crucial step towards addressing the concerns of the community, also highlights the need for proactive measures to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future. This includes conducting thorough cultural sensitivity training for staff and collaborators, engaging with local community leaders to gain a deeper understanding of local customs and values, and developing a clear and comprehensive code of conduct that outlines acceptable behavior in culturally sensitive settings. Furthermore, the incident raises questions about the responsibility of event organizers and sponsors to ensure that events are conducted in a respectful and appropriate manner. This includes conducting due diligence to assess the potential impact of events on local communities and implementing measures to mitigate any negative consequences. The controversy also provides an opportunity for dialogue and collaboration between different stakeholders, including artists, businesses, government officials, religious leaders, and community members. By working together, these stakeholders can develop strategies to promote cultural understanding, preserve local traditions, and foster sustainable tourism that benefits both the local economy and the community as a whole. In the long term, the resolution of this controversy will depend on the willingness of all parties involved to engage in open and honest communication, to learn from their mistakes, and to commit to building a more inclusive and respectful society. The fashion show incident serves as a valuable lesson in the importance of cultural sensitivity and the need to balance artistic expression with respect for local customs and values. It is a reminder that cultural exchange can be a powerful force for good, but only when it is conducted with humility, empathy, and a genuine commitment to understanding and appreciating different cultures.
Source: ‘Intention was to celebrate creativity’: Designers Shivan & Narresh apologise for J&K fashion show