 |
|
The cinematic landscape is often punctuated by sequels, continuations that seek to recapture the magic, expand upon the narrative, and deepen the connection with the audience established by their predecessors. However, the path to a successful sequel is fraught with peril, as it necessitates striking a delicate balance between honoring the source material and forging new ground. ‘L2: Empuraan,’ the highly anticipated follow-up to the Malayalam film ‘Lucifer,’ directed by Prithviraj Sukumaran, attempts to achieve this equilibrium but ultimately falls short, despite its rich production design and the presence of superstar Mohanlal. The review highlights a critical flaw: the film's over-reliance on symbolism that is delivered with an unsubtle hand, rendering it more distracting than meaningful. The recurrence of the letter 'L' to symbolize Lucifer, the anti-hero, is cited as a prime example of this heavy-handed approach, where subtlety is sacrificed for blatant symbolism. This lack of finesse detracts from the viewing experience and undermines the film's attempt to create a deeper, more nuanced narrative. Furthermore, the film suffers from a skewed focus, prioritizing the internationally notorious persona of Khureshi Ab’raam, also known as Lucifer, over the local avatar of Stephen Nedumpally, the central character of the first film. This shift in emphasis relegates Mohanlal's character to a mere guest appearance, diminishing his presence and impact on the storyline. While ‘Lucifer’ (2019) had its own imperfections, it possessed a certain quality that resonated with audiences, elevating it to a celebrated status in Malayalam commercial cinema. ‘Empuraan,’ however, lacks this inherent appeal, relying instead on its lavish production design to compensate for its narrative shortcomings. The story, which picks up five years after the events of ‘Lucifer,’ revolves around the political intrigues in Kerala, but these intrigues take a backseat as the narrative expands to encompass international drug cartels and intelligence agencies. This shift towards a more global scale feels forced and unnecessary, as the film becomes bogged down in predictable tropes and clichés. The reviewer criticizes the film's eagerness to showcase its various foreign locales, which often serve little purpose other than to provide visual spectacle. These sequences, while visually appealing, fail to contribute meaningfully to the overall narrative, resulting in a disjointed and underwhelming experience. The reviewer also points out the predictable climax and the lack of compelling character development as further weaknesses of the film. The storyline involving a third political force in Kerala and the origin story of Lucifer’s sidekick, Zayed Mazood, ultimately leads to a predictable conclusion, leaving the audience feeling underwhelmed and unfulfilled. The script, penned by Murali Gopy, draws heavily from the commercial potboilers of the 1990s, employing tired tropes and thinly veiled references to real-life political figures. This approach feels lazy and uninspired, failing to create a truly engaging and memorable cinematic experience. Gopy's penchant for biblical references and pop philosophy further exacerbates the problem, adding a layer of superficial intellectualism that does little to enhance the screenplay's depth or complexity. The core issue lies in the film's inability to create compelling scenarios or memorable exchanges, even for Mohanlal, the film's central figure. The character lacks a worthy adversary or a conflict that truly challenges him, resulting in a flat and uninspiring performance. While Manju Warrier's character is thankfully not relegated to the background as women often are in such star vehicles, the overall impact of the supporting cast is limited. The action sequences, with the exception of one set in a forest, are deemed passable but ultimately unremarkable. The climactic sequence, in particular, fails to deliver the excitement and intensity that one would expect from a film of this scale.
Beyond its narrative and characterization flaws, ‘Empuraan’ also suffers from problematic political messaging. While seemingly taking a strong stance against communal forces, the screenplay simultaneously promotes the very same propaganda by portraying Kerala politics as a corrupt and self-serving entity. This contradictory messaging undermines the film's attempt to convey a coherent and meaningful message, leaving the audience confused and disillusioned. The reviewer draws a parallel to Gopy's previous work, ‘Tiyaan,’ where the overt messaging and the underlying narrative were similarly at odds with each other. In both films, the desire for a flawed, all-powerful saviour is evident, reflecting a potentially problematic ideological stance. This desire for a single, dominant figure to solve complex societal problems can be seen as a reflection of a broader cultural trend, but it also raises concerns about the potential for authoritarianism and the suppression of dissenting voices. It is crucial for filmmakers to be mindful of the messages they are conveying and to ensure that their narratives promote critical thinking and democratic values, rather than reinforcing potentially harmful stereotypes or ideologies. The film's shortcomings are further highlighted by the fact that some of the pre-release fan theories posted online offered more compelling plot lines and character development than the actual screenplay. This suggests that there was a genuine desire among fans for a more nuanced and sophisticated narrative, but that the film ultimately failed to deliver. The reviewer concludes by lamenting the fact that the film's unprecedented marketing campaign was not matched by an equal investment in screenwriting. Had more effort been dedicated to crafting a compelling and engaging narrative, ‘Empuraan’ could have been a significantly better film. The success of a film ultimately hinges on the quality of its story and its ability to connect with the audience on an emotional level. Lavish production design and star power can only take a film so far; without a solid foundation in storytelling, it is destined to fall short of its potential. In the case of ‘Empuraan,’ the film's visual spectacle and star-studded cast are ultimately overshadowed by its narrative weaknesses, resulting in a disappointing cinematic experience.
In conclusion, ‘L2: Empuraan’ is a visually impressive but ultimately flawed sequel that fails to live up to the expectations set by its predecessor. Its heavy-handed symbolism, skewed focus, predictable plot, and problematic political messaging undermine its potential, resulting in a disappointing cinematic experience. While the film boasts a rich production design and the presence of superstar Mohanlal, these elements are not enough to compensate for its narrative shortcomings. The reviewer's critique highlights the importance of strong storytelling and character development in creating a successful film. Without a compelling narrative and relatable characters, even the most lavish production design and star-studded cast cannot save a film from mediocrity. The case of ‘Empuraan’ serves as a cautionary tale for filmmakers, reminding them that the key to success lies in crafting a well-written and engaging story that resonates with the audience on an emotional level. The film's failure to deliver on its promise underscores the importance of investing in quality screenwriting and avoiding the temptation to rely solely on visual spectacle and star power. Ultimately, a film's enduring legacy is determined by its ability to tell a compelling story that captures the imagination and leaves a lasting impact on the viewer. ‘Empuraan,’ unfortunately, falls short of this mark, leaving audiences with a sense of unfulfilled potential. The film's shortcomings highlight the challenges of creating successful sequels and the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between honoring the source material and forging new ground. While ‘Empuraan’ may appeal to die-hard fans of the ‘Lucifer’ franchise, it is unlikely to win over new audiences or leave a lasting impression on the broader cinematic landscape. The film's legacy will likely be as a visually impressive but ultimately disappointing sequel that failed to live up to its potential. The lessons learned from ‘Empuraan’ can serve as a valuable guide for filmmakers seeking to create successful sequels in the future, emphasizing the importance of strong storytelling, character development, and a clear and coherent narrative vision. By prioritizing these elements, filmmakers can increase their chances of creating sequels that not only honor the legacy of their predecessors but also forge new ground and leave a lasting impact on the audience.
Source: ‘L2: Empuraan’ movie review: Mohanlal, rich production design fail to save this sequel