 |
|
The Uttar Pradesh State Women's Commission has sparked controversy with its recent proposals aimed at protecting women from potential harassment. In a meeting held on October 28, the commission suggested that men should not be involved in tailoring clothes for women or cutting their hair. This recommendation, while presented as a protective measure, has been met with criticism from those who view it as discriminatory and an unnecessary restriction on professional choices.
The commission, led by Babita Chouhan, argues that these proposals are necessary to mitigate the risk of 'bad touch' and 'ill intentions' by male workers in these professions. Chouhan further emphasized the importance of employing women trainers in gyms catering to female clients, citing numerous complaints received by the commission regarding harassment in these settings. To ensure the safety of female gym-goers, she proposed mandatory police verification of all gym trainers and required written consent from women who choose to train with a male trainer.
The commission's recommendations extend beyond tailoring and fitness centers. They propose that tailor shops must have female staff available for taking measurements of women, and school buses transporting girls should have a female staff member on board. Additionally, the commission recommends the installation of CCTV cameras in coaching centers. These measures, while intended to enhance the safety of women in various settings, have been met with mixed reactions. Some support the commission's efforts to address concerns about harassment, while others criticize the proposals for being overly restrictive and promoting gender segregation.
The commission, through its member Himani Agarwal, has announced their intention to request the state government to enact laws based on these proposals. This move will likely further fuel the debate surrounding the effectiveness and fairness of these recommendations. The proposals raise questions about the role of government intervention in personal choices and the potential for perpetuating gender stereotypes.
Ultimately, the impact of these proposals will depend on their implementation and the response of the public and the state government. While the commission's intentions may be rooted in a desire to protect women, the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of these proposals remain to be seen. The ongoing discussion surrounding these recommendations highlights the complex challenges and ongoing need for constructive dialogue regarding gender roles, safety, and individual rights within a society.
Source: Men shouldn't cut women's hair, tailor their clothes: UP body's proposal