 |
|
This intriguing case highlights the complexities of the legal system when confronted with claims that fall outside conventional understanding. A man, identified only as a teacher, presented a petition to the Supreme Court of India, alleging that his brain was being controlled by a machine operated by unknown individuals. This outlandish claim, deemed “bizarre” by the court, ultimately resulted in the dismissal of his petition due to a lack of credible evidence and a logical basis for intervention.
The petitioner's journey to the Supreme Court began with his initial approach to the Andhra Pradesh High Court. He asserted that the machine, purportedly obtained from the Central Forensic Scientific Laboratory (CFSL) in Hyderabad, was being used to manipulate his thoughts without his consent. His petition demanded the deactivation of this device. However, the High Court, in November 2022, dismissed the petition after examining the counter-affidavits submitted by the CFSL and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Both agencies refuted the petitioner's claims, stating that no forensic examination had ever been conducted on him, and there was no machine in operation to control his brain. The court found no merit in the petitioner's request, effectively shutting down the case.
Undeterred by the High Court's decision, the petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking a Special Leave Petition to overturn the previous ruling. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, found the petitioner's claims utterly bizarre and lacking any scientific or legal basis. Recognizing the petitioner's apparent distress and the unusual nature of his allegations, the court instead of immediately dismissing the petition, directed the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee (SCLSC) to engage with the petitioner in his native language. The purpose of this engagement was to understand the petitioner's concerns more clearly and assess his mental state.
The SCLSC, after interacting with the petitioner, submitted a report to the Supreme Court. This report confirmed that the petitioner's sole request was for the deactivation of the alleged brain-controlling machine. The Supreme Court, based on the evidence presented and the absence of any scientific evidence or legal grounds, ultimately dismissed the petition, concluding that the claim was without merit. The Court stressed the lack of reason for intervention, highlighting the bizarre nature of the petitioner's allegations and the absence of any credible evidence to support his claims. This dismissal marked the end of a peculiar legal saga, showcasing the court's commitment to upholding legal principles and rejecting unfounded, unsubstantiated claims.
Source: Man Claims His Brain Being "Controlled" With Machine, Supreme Court Junks Petition