Supreme Court Ends Oral Mentions for Listings

Supreme Court Ends Oral Mentions for Listings
  • Supreme Court bans oral mentions
  • Urgent listings now require email
  • Written slips with reasons needed

The Supreme Court of India, under the leadership of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, has implemented a significant change in its procedural practices, eliminating the long-standing tradition of oral mentions for urgent listings. This shift towards a more structured and formal approach aims to streamline the process of scheduling urgent hearings and ensure a more transparent and efficient judicial system.

Effective immediately, lawyers seeking urgent listings will no longer be able to make oral requests directly to the court. Instead, they are now required to submit their requests via email or in written slips, providing clear and concise reasons for the urgency of the matter. This new directive, announced by CJI Khanna on Tuesday, underscores the Court's commitment to promoting a more organized and predictable environment for legal proceedings.

The rationale behind this change is rooted in the need for greater clarity and accountability in the handling of urgent cases. Previously, oral mentions often resulted in a chaotic and unpredictable process, with lawyers vying for the Court's attention and potentially leading to delays or inconsistencies in the prioritization of cases. By mandating written submissions with specific reasons, the Court aims to ensure that each request is carefully considered and evaluated based on its merits and the urgency it presents.

This new policy is expected to have a positive impact on the overall efficiency and transparency of the Supreme Court. By eliminating the reliance on oral mentions, the Court can focus on addressing cases based on their legal merits and the degree of urgency they warrant. This shift also creates a more equitable system, as it eliminates the potential for any lawyer to gain an unfair advantage through personal connections or persuasive tactics.

While some may argue that the elimination of oral mentions could hinder the ability of lawyers to present their cases in a timely manner, the Court's decision is likely to be viewed favorably by many legal practitioners. The introduction of a more structured and formalized process for urgent listings is seen as a step towards creating a more efficient and equitable system for the administration of justice in India.

Source: Supreme Court says no to oral mentioning after CJI Sanjiv Khanna takes over

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post