 |
|
The recent explosion in Delhi's Prashant Vihar neighborhood has sent shockwaves through the city, prompting a thorough investigation into the nature of the explosive device and the potential motives behind the attack. Preliminary forensic analysis reveals striking similarities between this incident and the October blast at a CRPF school, suggesting a possible connection or a pattern in the methods used by the perpetrators. Both incidents involved explosives containing Hydrogen Peroxide as a primary ingredient, indicating a concerning consistency in the construction of these improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The use of Hydrogen Peroxide is particularly troubling due to its accessibility and the relative ease with which it can be weaponized, raising serious concerns about the potential for future attacks.
Further analysis points to the use of Cordtex, a detonation wire commonly employed in mining operations, as the trigger mechanism for both explosions. The presence of Cordtex highlights a certain level of sophistication in the construction of these IEDs, indicating a degree of technical expertise on the part of those responsible. The fact that Cordtex allows for remote detonation adds to the dangerous nature of these devices, as it enables perpetrators to initiate the blast from a safe distance. Interestingly, both the Prashant Vihar and CRPF school blasts resulted in relatively low-intensity explosions, with minimal structural damage to the surrounding environment. Officials have described the explosives as being ‘lightly packed,’ meaning they were not densely compressed, leading to a less powerful detonation than might have been expected given the potential of the ingredients involved.
The low intensity of the blasts raises questions about the intended target and the overall goals of the perpetrators. Was the intent to cause widespread destruction and loss of life, or was the focus on creating fear and disruption? The lack of significant damage contrasts sharply with the potential lethality of the explosives used, suggesting a potential miscalculation in the amount of explosives deployed or a deliberate attempt to avoid causing extensive casualties. The investigation is currently focusing on gathering CCTV footage from nearby security cameras to identify any suspicious individuals or vehicles in the vicinity of the blast site. The National Security Guard (NSG) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) are providing critical support to the Delhi Police in this complex investigation, leveraging their specialized expertise in counter-terrorism and explosives analysis.
The similarities between the Prashant Vihar and CRPF school blasts underscore the urgent need for enhanced security measures and improved intelligence gathering to prevent future attacks. The relatively easily obtained ingredients and the apparent simplicity of constructing these IEDs raise concerns about the vulnerability of civilian targets and the potential for widespread imitation of these techniques. The ongoing investigation must not only focus on identifying those responsible for these specific incidents but also on understanding the broader context of these attacks and identifying any potential networks or groups that might be involved. The low intensity of the blasts raises questions about whether this represents a change in tactics by potential perpetrators or whether these were simply poorly executed attempts at causing more substantial damage.
The absence of any splinters or significant debris from either explosion is particularly noteworthy and could prove crucial in the ongoing investigation. This detail suggests a possible difference in the manufacturing or packaging of the explosives, potentially offering clues about the expertise and resources available to the perpetrators. The investigation is examining the possibility that the use of Hydrogen Peroxide, a common household chemical, highlights a potential effort to use readily available materials to avoid detection and to increase the difficulty of tracing the source of the explosives. The lack of a container or bag at the Prashant Vihar blast site further underscores the subtlety of the method used, highlighting the need for investigators to focus on less obvious indicators.
The involvement of both the NSG and NIA reflects the seriousness with which the government is treating this incident, underscoring the potential threat to national security and the importance of bringing the perpetrators to justice. The investigation is likely to explore various lines of inquiry, including potential links to organized crime, extremist groups, or individuals motivated by personal grievances. The case's progression will be closely followed by the public, eager for answers to the many unanswered questions surrounding these disturbing events. The successful resolution of this case will be vital not only for ensuring the safety and security of Delhi’s citizens but also for preventing future similar incidents and maintaining public confidence in the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies.
Source: Delhi's Prashant Vihar Blast: Explosives ‘Lightly Packed’, Similar To Those Used In CRPF School Case