 |
|
The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the legal sphere continues to unfold, as evidenced by a recent, groundbreaking interaction between Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and an AI lawyer. This historic event, which took place at the inauguration ceremony of the National Judicial Museum and Archive (NJMA) in the Supreme Court, marked a significant milestone in the evolution of the legal landscape. The Chief Justice, known for his forward-thinking approach to technology, posed a pertinent question to the AI lawyer: 'Is the death penalty constitutional in India?'
The AI lawyer, clad in an advocate's coat, delivered a concise and accurate response: 'Yes, the death penalty is constitutional in India. It is reserved for the rarest of rare cases as determined by the Supreme Court where the crime is exceptionally heinous and warrants such a punishment.' This response elicited amusement from Chief Justice Chandrachud and other advocates present, highlighting the potential of AI to provide quick and informative answers in legal contexts.
The CJI's engagement with the AI lawyer underscores his belief in the transformative potential of technology in the legal domain. Earlier pronouncements by Chandrachud have highlighted his advocacy for the use of AI in 'delivering justice.' The inauguration of the NJMA itself emphasizes the court's commitment to embracing modern technology, showcasing a museum comparable to international standards. This institution aims to project the importance of the Indian judiciary and its role in delivering justice to citizens and safeguarding their fundamental rights.
Source: Chief Justice asks AI lawyer question on death penalty, watch its response