 |
|
The political landscape in Uttar Pradesh has been further inflamed by the recent clash between the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) over the use of bulldozers in response to the violence in Bahraich. This incident, which saw the killing of Ramgopal Mishra during clashes between two communities, has resulted in the arrest of five individuals and the issuing of demolition notices to the accused. The SP, however, vehemently criticizes the Chief Minister's approach, arguing that it goes against the principles of the rule of law.
Awadhesh Prasad, the SP MP from Ayodhya, has condemned the demolition notices issued to the accused, stating that there is no provision in Indian law for the use of bulldozers in such situations. He argues that while severe punishments exist, including the death penalty, demolishing property is not a legally sanctioned method of dealing with crime. Prasad criticizes the CM's actions, stating that it appears as if he is imposing his own brand of law in the state, straying from the established legal framework. He calls these actions a manifestation of 'jungle law', where authorities operate outside the bounds of law.
The BJP government, on the other hand, maintains that the demolition notices are issued against illegal constructions and that the state government is taking firm action against those involved in the Bahraich violence. The state's Public Works Department (PWD) issued a demolition notice for the residence of Abdul Hameed, one of the accused, for alleged illegal construction. This action follows the arrest of five individuals, two of whom were injured during an encounter with police. The situation in Bahraich is now reported to be under control, with the police taking necessary steps to maintain peace and order.
This incident has exposed a deeper political divide in Uttar Pradesh, with the SP advocating for the strict adherence to the legal system and the BJP emphasizing swift action against those accused of violence. The use of bulldozers as a punitive measure has drawn significant criticism from opposition parties and civil society organizations, who argue that it undermines the principles of justice and due process. The debate surrounding this incident is likely to continue, with both sides attempting to garner public support for their respective positions.