 |
|
Omar Abdullah's recent oath-taking ceremony has sparked widespread online discussions, primarily due to the shift in his allegiance declaration compared to his 2009 oath as Chief Minister. The video footage from both ceremonies has gone viral, prompting comparisons and analysis of his words. The key difference lies in the constitutional body he pledged allegiance to.
In 2009, Abdullah swore to uphold the constitution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, reflecting the region's unique status at the time. However, during the recent ceremony, he took the oath to uphold the Indian constitution. This subtle shift in wording has ignited conversations across various platforms, with many speculating on the implications and motivations behind this change.
The contrast between the two oaths speaks volumes about the evolving political landscape of Jammu and Kashmir. The 2009 oath reflected the region's special status, while the 2024 oath aligns with the post-Article 370 abrogation reality. This change signals a shift in the political discourse surrounding the region's autonomy and its relationship with the Indian Union. While the precise implications of this change remain to be seen, the shift in wording has undoubtedly ignited a national conversation on the evolving political dynamics of the region.
Source: Omar Abdullah's 2009, 2024 oath videos viral, change of this one word caught attention