 |
|
The statement by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar regarding the distribution of projects across India's states has sparked discussions about the nature of federalism and resource allocation in the country. Jaishankar, a member of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), asserted that not all projects have been directed solely to BJP-ruled states in the past 10 years, highlighting the concept of 'competitive federalism' as a positive force for India's development.
The notion of 'competitive federalism' posits that healthy competition among states can lead to better governance and economic progress. States strive to attract investment and create conducive environments for growth, ultimately benefiting the nation as a whole. However, the statement has also fueled debate regarding the equitable distribution of resources and the potential for bias in project allocation based on political affiliations.
India operates under a federal system, where power is shared between the central government and individual states. This system necessitates careful coordination to ensure that development benefits all regions and populations. The allocation of resources and projects must be based on objective criteria, transparency, and fairness. While competitive federalism can be a driving force for progress, it's essential to ensure that it does not undermine the principles of equity and inclusivity in resource distribution.
Source: Not all projects came to BJP-ruled states in last 10 years: EAM Jaishankar