 |
|
The Supreme Court of India has issued a stern reprimand to the states of Haryana and Punjab for their lack of action against farmers engaging in stubble burning, a practice that significantly contributes to the deteriorating air quality in the Delhi-National Capital Region. This action follows a consistent pattern of inaction by the states despite the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) issuing directives as far back as June 2021 to curb this harmful practice. The Court has summoned the Chief Secretaries of both states to appear before it on October 23rd to explain their inaction and the lack of effective implementation of the CAQM's orders.
The Court's frustration stems from the blatant disregard shown by the states towards the environmental crisis caused by stubble burning. Despite the availability of legal frameworks and clear directives from the CAQM, the states have failed to take any meaningful steps to enforce these regulations. The Court has expressed its disappointment, labeling the situation as a matter of “complete insensitivity” and highlighting the lack of accountability within the state governments. This inaction has led to a situation where farmers continue to engage in stubble burning, further exacerbating the already dire air pollution situation in the region.
In addition to holding the states accountable, the Court has also raised serious concerns about the qualifications and effectiveness of the CAQM itself. The Court questioned the expertise of the CAQM members, expressing doubt about their qualifications and experience in addressing air pollution issues. This criticism is significant as it highlights the shortcomings of the regulatory body entrusted with the crucial task of managing air quality. The Court has demanded an action plan from the CAQM to ensure compliance from the states and has directed the CAQM to provide a report on its future plans for addressing this persistent environmental challenge.
The Supreme Court's strong stance on the issue of stubble burning is a clear indication of the urgent need for immediate action. The Court has made it clear that it will not tolerate the continued inaction of the states and the regulatory body. This case is a reminder of the critical role of the judiciary in safeguarding the environment and holding authorities accountable for their failures to protect public health. The court's directives to the state governments and the CAQM represent a significant turning point in the fight against air pollution, and it remains to be seen whether the states will finally take the necessary steps to address this long-standing problem.