 |
|
The recent remarks by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud about praying for a solution to the Ayodhya dispute have sparked criticism from Congress leader Udit Raj. Raj, known for his outspoken views, took to social media to express his dissent, suggesting that if the CJI had prayed for other issues, justice would be readily accessible to the common man without the need for financial resources.
Chandrachud, during a speech in his native village of Kanhersar, had mentioned praying to God for a solution to the long-standing Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute. He stated that he had sought divine intervention while presiding over the case, which was before him for three months. While acknowledging the complexity of the matter, Chandrachud emphasized the power of faith and asserted that God always finds a way if one believes.
Raj's criticism, however, focuses on the perception of unequal access to justice in India. He contends that if the CJI could invoke divine intervention for one specific issue, it begs the question why similar prayers aren't offered for other pressing concerns like misuse of investigative agencies and the pursuit of justice without financial burdens. Raj's statement underscores the deep-seated anxieties surrounding the judiciary's impartiality and the common man's ability to secure justice in a system often perceived as favoring the privileged.
This exchange highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the role of religion and personal beliefs in legal proceedings. While some may view Chandrachud's prayer as a testament to his personal faith, others might interpret it as a potential conflict of interest or an indication of bias. The controversy also reflects the broader discourse on the Indian judiciary, its effectiveness in addressing societal issues, and the accessibility of justice for all citizens.
Source: Congress leader's jab at CJI DY Chandrachud on 'Ayodhya' remark: ‘Common man can get justice if…’