 |
|
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has brought a new dimension to the international stage, with the potential for escalation hanging in the balance. The recent meeting between British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House highlighted this precarious situation, as the two leaders grappled with the implications of providing Ukraine with long-range missiles capable of striking targets deep inside Russia. The outcome of their discussions, while not explicitly revealed, underscored the complexities and risks associated with such a decision.
The news of the postponed decision on supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles sparked a wave of speculation and analysis. The prevailing view was that the US and UK were hesitant to provide such weapons for fear of escalating the conflict and potentially drawing NATO into a direct confrontation with Russia. The potential consequences of escalating the conflict are immense, with the risk of a wider war and the use of nuclear weapons looming over the horizon.
The article quotes Prime Minister Starmer's statement, where he mentions that the meeting with President Biden focused on various strategic issues and was not specifically about the long-range missile capability. This vagueness leaves room for interpretation, suggesting that the decision on supplying such weapons may be subject to further deliberation and contingent on various factors, including the evolving battlefield situation and the potential ramifications of such a move.
Source: West Admits Putin’s Fear After ‘Direct War’ Threat? US, UK Delay Decision On Deep Russia Strikes