 |
|
The recent case of the woman doctor who was tragically raped and murdered at Kolkata's RG Kar hospital has sparked widespread outrage and grief. This tragic incident has been further compounded by the circulation of photos and videos related to the victim, which has led to a strong response from the Supreme Court. The court, deeply disturbed by the unauthorized dissemination of these materials, has demanded immediate action from the Central government to stop this deeply offensive and disrespectful act. The Supreme Court's frustration stems from their previous ruling that explicitly banned the use of pictures and videos of the victim on all platforms, including Wikipedia. This ban was put in place to protect the victim's dignity and prevent further exploitation of her tragic situation.
Despite the court's clear directive, the circulation of such content has persisted, forcing the Supreme Court to address this issue once again. The woman doctor's parents, understandably distressed by this continued violation, informed the court that artificial intelligence was being used to generate videos that were now widely circulating online. This development highlights the complex challenges associated with regulating digital content and preventing the misuse of powerful technologies. The emergence of AI-generated videos further complicates the situation, as they can potentially create and distribute deeply disturbing content without any physical evidence or direct involvement of individuals.
The Supreme Court, determined to uphold the victim's memory and ensure that justice prevails, has made it clear that they will not tolerate further violation of their previous order. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, leading the three-judge bench hearing the case, explicitly stated that if anyone wishes to stop the release of the film based on the doctor's life, they must take the legal route. This statement signifies the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served in this case. The Supreme Court's stance highlights the critical role of the judiciary in protecting individual rights, ensuring the proper handling of sensitive situations, and holding those responsible accountable for their actions. This case serves as a stark reminder of the complex challenges we face in a digital age, where technology can be used for both good and harm, and where the need for ethical considerations and legal oversight is paramount.
Source: Supreme Court Upset Over RG Kar Victim's Photos On Social Media