 |
|
The Supreme Court's decision to grant interim bail to actor Siddique in a rape case has sparked controversy in Kerala, with politicians expressing concerns about the implications for women's rights. The court's decision has been met with criticism from Kerala ministers, who argue that the court should prioritize the safety and justice for victims in such cases.
Higher Education Minister R Bindu stated that the Supreme Court has a responsibility to stand with women in cases of sexual assault. She highlighted the importance of evidence in such cases and questioned the relevance of anticipatory bail when strong evidence exists. She also pointed out that Siddique went into hiding after the high court dismissed his bail plea, hindering the police investigation.
Former Health Minister and CPM central committee member K K Shailaja, while acknowledging that one cannot predict court decisions, emphasized that the police have not taken any proactive steps to protect Siddique. She highlighted the government's efforts in presenting the seriousness of the case to the court, including the appointment of the Hema Committee to investigate the allegations.
The case itself involves a complaint of rape filed against Siddique by a young actor. The incident allegedly occurred eight years ago, but the Supreme Court questioned the delay in registering the complaint. The court's decision to grant interim bail to Siddique has raised concerns about the potential impact on the investigation and the message it sends regarding the protection of women in such cases.
Source: Supreme Court: Supreme Court's Controversial Bail Decision: Women’s Rights at Stake in Siddique Case