 |
|
The Supreme Court of India has issued a strong condemnation of the practice of 'bulldozer justice,' which involves the demolition of properties belonging to individuals accused of crimes, even if they haven't been convicted. In a case concerning the threatened demolition of a house belonging to Javedali Mahebubmiya Saiyed, the court asserted that in a country governed by the rule of law, the actions of one family member cannot justify punitive measures against other family members or their legally constructed residences. The court emphatically stated that alleged involvement in criminal activities does not serve as grounds for demolishing property.
The court's ruling underscores the importance of upholding due process and the presumption of innocence in the legal system. Demolishing homes without proper legal justification constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and undermines the principles of fairness and justice. The practice of 'bulldozer justice' has drawn widespread criticism for its arbitrary nature and potential for abuse. Critics argue that it can be used as a tool for intimidation and harassment, particularly against marginalized communities.
The Supreme Court's judgment serves as a crucial reminder that the rule of law must be paramount in all legal proceedings. While it is essential to uphold law and order, this must be achieved through legitimate and lawful means. The court's stance against 'bulldozer justice' reinforces the importance of respecting individual rights and ensuring that all citizens are treated fairly and justly under the law. It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact the ongoing debate surrounding the use of 'bulldozer justice' in India.
Source: 'Running bulldozer over laws': SC on threats to demolish house of accused