 |
|
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has taken a strong stance against madrasas in India, arguing that they are inadequate for providing proper education to children. In a written submission to the Supreme Court, the NCPCR asserts that the education imparted in madrasas is not comprehensive and contradicts the provisions of the Right to Education (RTE) Act. This statement follows a case where the Allahabad High Court declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, unconstitutional due to its alleged violation of secularism and fundamental rights.
The NCPCR criticizes madrasas for lacking a structured curriculum and evaluation procedure, citing their deviation from the provisions of Section 29 of the RTE Act. Furthermore, the Commission highlights that the absence of a standardized curriculum in madrasas deprives children of essential educational benefits outlined in the RTE Act, including midday meals, uniforms, and qualified teachers. The NCPCR argues that the exemption granted to madrasas from the RTE Act has a detrimental impact on the education of children attending these institutions.
The Commission further expresses concerns about the content of Diniyat books included in the madrasa curriculum. The NCPCR claims that these books promote the supremacy of Islam, which they deem objectionable. The NCPCR also cites instances of fatwas issued by the Darul Uloom Deoband, which allegedly contain inappropriate content, including references to sexual relationships with minors. The commission emphasizes the presence of such materials in madrasas is illegal and detrimental to the well-being of children. These concerns raise serious questions about the quality and safety of education provided in madrasas, prompting calls for greater oversight and reform.
Source: ‘Madrasa is an unfit place to receive proper education’: Top child rights body to Supreme Court