 |
|
The recent visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the residence of Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on September 11 for Ganapathi pooja celebrations has sparked controversy. DMK Rajya Sabha MP P. Wilson, a senior counsel, has come out in defense of the CJI, stating that the controversy is unwarranted and that judges should not be socially ostracized from politically connected individuals.
Wilson argues that while judges must be independent in their official duties, this does not necessitate their complete isolation from all politically connected individuals in private and social settings. He emphasizes that CJI Chandrachud has consistently demonstrated impeccable integrity, impartiality, and honesty throughout his career, and that the controversy surrounding the PM's visit is an infringement on the CJI's right to privacy and freedom to celebrate religious festivities with his family and chosen guests.
This incident highlights the complex relationship between the judiciary and the executive branch in India. While the judiciary is expected to remain independent and impartial, there are instances where interactions between judges and politicians are inevitable, particularly in a country with a strong democratic tradition. The controversy surrounding the PM's visit raises questions about the boundaries of judicial independence and the potential for blurring the lines between personal and official interactions. It also underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring public trust in the judiciary.
Source: ‘Controversy surrounding PM’s visit to CJI’s residence unwarranted’: DMK MP Wilson