 |
|
The recent Supreme Court ruling halting the controversial 'bulldozer justice' practice in Uttar Pradesh has sparked a heated debate, with Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav seizing the opportunity to criticize the BJP government's actions. Yadav, a vocal critic of the ruling party's tactics, used the court's decision as a platform to launch an attack on UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, calling the use of bulldozers a symbol of an 'identity crisis' for those who had embraced them as a tool of governance.
The Supreme Court's order, which prohibits any demolition of properties, including those belonging to accused individuals, without its explicit permission, was deemed necessary to safeguard the fundamental principles of the Constitution. The court declared that even a single instance of illegal demolition would be considered a violation of the Constitution's core values, effectively undermining the rule of law. This ruling effectively brought an end to the practice of bulldozers being used to punish alleged criminals or to intimidate political opponents, a practice that had become synonymous with the Yogi Adityanath administration.
Akhilesh Yadav, in his statement on social media, declared that the Supreme Court's order had not only sidelined the use of bulldozers but also exposed the destructive political strategy of those who had relied on them. He further stated that the bulldozer's wheels had come off, and the time had come to park both the machinery and those who had operated it. The SP leader's remarks, delivered in a bold and direct manner, highlighted the growing concern over the use of bulldozers as a means of delivering justice and the potential for abuse of power.
Prior to the Supreme Court intervention, there had been a tense exchange of words between Akhilesh Yadav and Yogi Adityanath regarding the bulldozer actions. Yadav had stated that if the SP government came to power, the bulldozers would be directed towards Gorakhpur, a thinly veiled threat targeting the CM's stronghold. In response, Yogi Adityanath had defended the use of bulldozers, claiming that it required courage to confront criminals, and not everyone possessed the strength to do so. This exchange epitomized the deep political divide in Uttar Pradesh and the escalating tension between the ruling BJP and the opposition SP.
Beyond the bulldozer controversy, Akhilesh Yadav extended his congratulations to Atishi, who has been appointed as Delhi's chief minister. He praised her as a 'combative and determined' leader, acknowledging the challenges she faces in leading the capital while confronting the BJP's 'negative politics'. The SP chief's message reflected a broader political landscape where the BJP and its opponents are locked in a fierce struggle for power, with Delhi emerging as a significant battleground.
The recent events in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi point towards a politically charged atmosphere in India. The Supreme Court's decision on bulldozers has triggered a debate about the use of force in the name of justice and the potential for abuse of power. Akhilesh Yadav's response highlights the ongoing conflict between the BJP and its opposition, with both parties seeking to gain an advantage in the upcoming elections. The appointment of Atishi as Delhi's chief minister further adds to the complexities of Indian politics, with the capital now becoming a pivotal stage for the national political drama.
Source: Identity crisis for those who made bulldozer their symbol: Akhilesh