 |
|
The Indian government's initiative to introduce lateral entry into the bureaucracy, aimed at bringing in fresh talent and expertise, has sparked heated debate surrounding the lack of reservation provisions for Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) candidates. This article delves into the rationale behind lateral entry, its implementation, and the criticisms it faces, shedding light on the complex issue of reservation and its implications in this context.
The concept of lateral entry was first proposed by NITI Aayog and the Sectoral Group of Secretaries on Governance in 2017. The rationale behind this policy was to inject fresh perspective and expertise into the bureaucracy, particularly at middle and senior management levels. The government argued that individuals with specialized knowledge and experience from various sectors, including state governments, public sector undertakings, research institutes, and even the private sector, could contribute significantly to the administration's effectiveness. These lateral entrants were initially offered contracts of three years, extendable to a total term of five years.
However, the implementation of lateral entry has been met with strong criticism, primarily due to the absence of reservation quotas for SC, ST, and OBC candidates. Critics argue that this omission undermines the principle of social justice and perpetuates existing inequalities in the Indian system. They contend that the lack of reservation in lateral recruitment disproportionately benefits upper-caste candidates and reinforces their dominance within the bureaucracy. This, they argue, further marginalizes historically disadvantaged communities, preventing their fair representation in government positions.
The government, in its defense, has cited the nature of lateral entry appointments as deputation, where mandatory reservation is not required. They maintain that candidates selected through lateral entry are essentially being taken on deputation from their parent organizations, and hence, the existing reservation policy does not apply. This argument, however, has been challenged by critics, who contend that the government's deliberate choice to advertise these positions separately for each department effectively bypasses the reservation system, rendering it ineffective.
The debate surrounding lateral entry and reservation underscores the complexities of implementing affirmative action policies in a diverse and hierarchical society like India. While the government aims to enhance efficiency and effectiveness by bringing in specialized skills, it must also ensure that its policies are inclusive and promote social justice. Finding a balance between these competing objectives remains a challenge, and the current debate on lateral entry highlights the need for a comprehensive and equitable approach that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders.